And other than the disease, they're an invasive predator that are now competing with native species. So there's been a bunch of ecological damage from pregnancy-test-frogs. So this digital test isn't exactly unprecedented!
1
9
1
232
but yeah. The final summation is probably: Get this digital version of the test if you need it, it's fine. If you're worried you won't read it correctly, if you have vision problems, if you're just scared... go ahead! Just please recycle the battery.
3
30
1
334
but if you don't need the accessibility features and you're going to be doing a bunch of tests (like if you're trying to get pregnant), you'll save money and generate less waste by getting the test strips. They're like 15$ for 50 of them.
2
15
0
302
And you can always get a digital one (or go to a doctor for a professional test) if you need confirmation of an uncertain result.
1
3
0
194
BTW, one thing I didn't mention because I didn't know about it: There's a tiktok meme going around that the "pill" I mentioned is a morning-after pill. Since this got big, lemme just confirm: NO IT IS NOT, PLEASE DON'T EAT IT
1
12
2
290
not only will it not WORK, it's a moisture-absorbing material to keep the test from being thrown off by too much liquid. So it's basically the same as those desiccant packets you get in a lot of electronics, the ones that are covered in "DO NOT EAT".
1
7
0
247
when I called it a "pill" I mean "pill-shaped", but that was some bad phrasing given that hoax meme.
1
4
0
209
Anyway there's an alternate universe where I tear down one of these and find, instead of a test strip, a tiny frog in a little self-contained aquarium, and I think that's the image we should all take away from this.
8
42
3
910
I'm seeing a lot of people replying to this without reading to the corrections later on, so this is probably not worth explaining (if you're mad at me after 25 posts you're not gonna change your mind when you get to post 57). I'm sorry about the thread's tone.
4
8
1
234
It seemed dismissive and flippant to a lot of people, which wasn't intentional. I do a lot of tech teardowns here, but usually I'm doing it to less important stuff, like computer mice or telephones and the like.
2
1
0
186
The tone I take with them is usually like "let's see what silly stuff they jammed into this thing, and what weird ways they made it work!" I'm doing it because I find it interesting to see how things are built and how they work.

5:52 PM · Sep 4, 2020

2
3
0
238
the thing I didn't consider with this thread is that while doing it that way is fine for something like a keyboard, doing it for a medical device like this, especially one that's sex-specific? It sounded like I didn't care about the issues related to the device.
3
10
0
217
so a lot of people got the impression that I was a techbro being like "PFFT, WASTING GOOD SILICON ON SILLY WOMEN'S PROBLEMS! WE SHOULD INSTEAD USE THOSE CHIPS TO PLAY VIDEOGAMES AND CALCULATE PRIME NUMBERS!"
5
6
4
260
again, not intended that way AT ALL, but at the same time it's not like I'm blameless for how it came across. I should have thought more about how this would come across, especially once it got retweeted out of my particular follower-bubble.
5
2
1
302
So it's something to keep in mind for the future, when I'm talking about things like this which stray outside of my usual "some weird/old computer thing" teardowns. This one definitely has wider social implications I should have thought more about before tweeting as usual.
31
10
3
348
hey look, some good news:
2
2
0
100
Replying to @Foone
💛
0
0
0
0