This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author.
Furthermore, he refutes Barr’s fatuous argument that there can be no obstruction without an underlying crime, and preemptively offers devastating legal and constitutional rebuttal to claim that POTUS can’t be charged for exercising Article II powers.
1
2
4
In short, Barr’s summary, the basis for a month of headlines and tweets about “no obstruction,” could not be more dishonest or disreputable. (The claim of “no collusion”—distinct from criminal conspiracy—turns out to be just as phony.) All should read and judge for themselves.

Apr 20, 2019 · 5:56 PM UTC

3
7