This is getting missed in all the indigence from Meadows and his folks. This was a negative * antibody * test. It just means Trump wasn’t producing antibodies at that point. Has no bearing on whether he was infected, which a different test would have show.
3) From Meadows’ description and the Guardian’s summary, it sounds like Trump was tested with an unnamed rapid test — and after his positive result, that same sample was rerun, somewhat later, through another antigen test.
This is not the way to do accurate coronavirus testing.
Show this thread